Free

Free Will Philosophy EssayI strongly believe that W.T. Stace is correct while arguing for the view of mushy determinism, also known as compatibilism. Stace believes in compatibilism, which states that determinism is true, that devoid will still does exist. He puts both views unitedly by studying the interpretation of free will. Stace asks, How can any one and only(a) be punished or rewarded for his or her actions if they have no control over their actions? That statement seemed extremely convincing to me because both dHolbach and Chisholm supported one side of the argument. dHolbach and Chisholm argued that we argon either strictly determined by the laws of nature and physics or that we ar not determined, earlier being we have the power to do as we choose. Stace on the other hand, put both positions together and made them work together. He explained that the laws of nature and physics do have an impact on our choices, but we do have the ability to choose what we want to choose when making a decision.Outside forces whitethorn push on our decision, but we are the ones responsible for choosing what we want to choose. He persuasively defends his view of soft determinism by explaining the definition of free will. He states, In order for one to define free will, one must look into how the phrase is commonly used. The trend a philosopher interprets free will is different than the way a common person will do so.Stace defines free acts as acts that are directly caused by a persons internal thoughts or desires coming directly from the person. Not free acts are those that have outside forces pushing a person to do something a certain way much(prenominal) as a threat or harm. This was very different from what other philosophers have stated in the past. By providing examples of free will, Stace points out that free will clearly does exist. It wouldnt make sense for free will not to exist since it is compatible with determinism.